Related Articles

Catalyst for change:
Interview with
Lim Siong Guan


Reflections on
10 years of change:
Interview with
Eddie Teo


Clarion call for continual change:
Interview with Peter Ho

Catalyst for change:
Interview with Lim Siong Guan


 
Ten years ago, as Permanent Secretary (PS) (Prime Minister’s Office), Mr Lim Siong Guan founded the PS21 movement, which has since left its mark on every aspect of the Public Service. As Head, Civil Service and now PS (Finance), he has continued to champion the cause of change in the Public Service. In a recent interview with Challenge, Mr Lim reflects on the key ideas behind PS21. We bring you the highlights.

(Click to read more)
What prompted you to start the PS21 movement in 1995?
There was no sudden event which caused the birth of the PS21 movement. Rather, it was a sense of discomfort that the Public Service as a whole did not see change as a way of life. Tomorrow is not like today. Yet the Public Service did not see the need to change with a sense
of urgency.

That is the real driver of the PS21 movement: how do you bring people to the stage where they see the need for change, are willing to change and want to change? How do we anticipate
that future?

This is why the objective of PS21 is to “Be in Time for the Future”; its “burning platform” (the reason for change) is a future which is both uncertain and unpredictable.

TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY
When I became the Permanent Secretary of Defence in 1981, I started the MINDEF Productivity Movement. Much of PS21 has its origins in my 10-plus years of experience with the MINDEF Productivity Movement. This was why I was able to launch PS21 with a certain confidence —
I knew what worked and what did not work so well in MINDEF.

Productivity is a total, holistic thing: it is not just WITS and Suggestions. You have to deal with the motivation of people, the resources you give to them, the efficiency of processes and how to get everyone actively involved.

The task of building a defence force is such that you don’t quite know how the future will turn out, but you have to think ahead and act in good time: how do you build up the systems, how do you train your people, so that they are ready to take on future challenges as they unfold.

This is why PS21 has its three pillars of “Anticipate Change”, “Welcome Change” and “Execute Change”. And a central idea is that everyone at every level should be thinking all the time — what we refer to in PS21 as “Everyone an Activist for Change”.

PS21 IS ABOUT PROCESS
I’m not saying all the activities in PS21 were not there before. WITS is something which people were already doing from the early 1980s as part of the National Productivity Movement; suggestions schemes were already there in the Civil Service, except that they were never organised for the broad reach and extensive participation under PS21.

What PS21 did was introduce a framework for thinking about these change processes, and a framework by which you can draw everyone in. PS21 is not content-driven. PS21 is process-driven. The process is never-ending: you have to keep questioning, keep modifying, keep improving, keep reaching out.
The Singapore Public Service already has a reputation for being efficient and effective. We have achieved good results. Why is it still important to emphasise change and having the right processes?
It is not enough to have good results. We have to ensure that we have sustainable good performance. You can always get good results by taking short-cuts, by telling people to just concentrate on one area, and forget about the other things that you are doing.

But if you want sustainable excellence and sustainable good results, you need to get your processes right, you need to get people always looking out for a better way, you need to get your values and work environment right, to encourage participation and new ideas.

Fundamentally this is what PS21 is about: it is not about chasing results, it is about values, about organisational and leadership philosophy, about capacity.

If you have an emergency, then you just go handle it, and we’re very good at that. But if you are looking for a continuing capability to deal with things that may arise which you don’t even know anything about yet, then you need to build capacity to handle that.

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR THE FUTURE

Why were the rules for training changed? It’s because of our focus on the future. I’m talking about training people so that they are in a good position to handle future tasks and future jobs.

And this is why we changed the rules, to say: everybody has access to at least 100 hours of learning a year. Supervisors, you can help your staff make good use of their 100 hours, but you have no right to prevent them from getting the 100 hours on the argument that “they already know how to do their tasks well”.
For public officers at large, what does it mean to be “in time for the future”?
The world around you is changing all the time: it is not something we can stop. Instead, we should see it as an opportunity to do better. We want you to be involved in making the change and taking advantage of the opportunities. Use your initiative. If you know where change needs to be made, please, we want to hear from you. If you can do it yourself, please carry on, do it.

Looking for improvement day by day is very important. It is a state of mind to always be wondering: “What can I do better? How can I do better? How can I be better? How can I improve on what I’m doing?”

Ideas for change can come from anywhere. Your customers can tell you. If they do not volunteer feedback, ask them. They may be members of the public. They may be another government agency. You could get ideas from reading a book, watching a movie, talking with your friends, watching your parents or your children. And the drive for change could come from your boss.

No matter the source, so long as the ideas are sound, we should all be prepared to welcome the change, support the change, and drive the change. Change is an integral part of our lives. Change — so long as it is for the better — is a good thing.
In your experience, what is the best way to harness the creativity and capacity of our people?
All reasonable people want to do well. They want to succeed and feel good about themselves and their accomplishments. So help them. Make it possible for them to try and to learn and to
try again.

How do we get our people actively involved? Through suggestions: anything that you want changed, any improvement that you think can be made, we want to hear from you.

What you are inviting people to do all the time is try. After you try, if it doesn’t work, it doesn’t work. But if it works, then you would have accomplished something which you never imagined you could accomplish.

But while each one is invited to think and try, the leader must draw their thoughts and actions together towards some worthwhile end. Otherwise a lot of time, effort and energy will be wasted, and everyone will be disappointed.

HARNESSING IDEAS
What is WITS about? WITS is a mechanism by which people can contribute their ideas as a team. It is based on the premise that there is a limit to how many ideas and how well each one of us can think. When we come together with others to discuss our ideas, we build upon one another’s views and the final ideas are better than when they
first started.

How can we get a group of people to be able to come together, discuss issues, make everybody feel they are participating, and find consensus in the decision-making process? The big strength of WITS tools is that they help guide discussions, create focus and clarity in thinking, and strengthen solutions. They are all visualisation tools which help keep everyone on the same page during discussions, and help build conviction and consensus. I am always troubled when people say WITS tools are an impediment, when they themselves have never used them.

IMPORTANCE OF SUPERVISORS
People judge organisations and processes according to how their immediate supervisor acts and reacts. So if the supervisor believes “it is really great that my people are thinking all the time”, that’s very good. But if the supervisor reacts on the basis that “every suggestion you make is extra work for me”, then he will not only kill the spirit of his people, but he will be like a cancer killing the life of his organisation. He does not need to say it in words, he will be saying it clearly enough with his body language, and the slowness and negativity with which he looks at his people’s suggestions.
What are the key PS21 principles that will continue to be important in
the future?
I see PS21 as absolutely key to having an alert, energetic, effective and efficient Public Service.
I would summarise PS21 as follows:
Theme of PS21: Continuous Change
Reason for PS21: Unending Uncertainty
Thrust of PS21: Change as a Way of Life
Means of PS21: Harvesting Creativity
End of PS21: In Time for the Future

If I were to boil things down, I would say there are only two keys to a truly excellent Public Service. These are: Be in Time for the Future, and Harness the Creativity of your People.

“Be in Time for the Future” is the essence of PS21. It takes as its burning platform the future — uncertain and unpredictable, but something you have to prepare for. We must do well in Anticipating Change, Welcoming Change and Executing Change.

“Harness the Creativity of your People” is how we can be the best Public Service possible. We cannot be the best we can be if our people are not, each, the best they can be. If you want to get the most out of your organisation, you need to help your officers be the best that they can be, and give them the ability to do the best that they can possibly do. But you have to draw the capabilities of your people together for a worthy common end to bring Singapore forward. You must seek synergy even while you encourage initiative, innovation and diversity.

This is my theory about all organisations. You want the best performing organisation — do all you can to Be in Time for the Future, and Harness the Creativity of your People.
 
 
Next:
Reflections on 10 years of change: Interview with Eddie Teo